Features/VMSnapshotEnchancement: Difference between revisions
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= VM | = VM Snapshot enhancement = | ||
This feature will enhance VM | This feature will enhance VM snapshot functionality, to make it possible lively taking internal/external snapshots, | ||
and make it works better with underlining components such as LVM. | and make it works better with underlining components such as LVM to take snapshot by them instead of qemu. Qemu then | ||
will have a completed picture about snapshot methods: | |||
--qemu manage snapshots: | |||
|----internal case | |||
|----external case | |||
--qemu do not manage snapshots: | |||
|----block drain case | |||
* '''Name:''' [[User:Wenchao|Wenchao Xia]] | * '''Name:''' [[User:Wenchao|Wenchao Xia]] | ||
Line 11: | Line 22: | ||
This feature would provide APIs that can do: | This feature would provide APIs that can do: | ||
* 1 block device live snapshot as internal/external/ | * 1 block device live snapshot as internal/external data or drain I/O to cooperate with external components, export sync API for all type. | ||
* 2 vmstate live save as internal/external data, export async API for external data, | * 2 vmstate live save as internal/external data, export async API for external data, with fixed size. | ||
* 3 combination | * 3 combination of above, and make screendump at the correct time. | ||
= Subtask Details = | = Subtask Details = | ||
TBD. | |||
= General Goal = | = General Goal = | ||
Line 38: | Line 36: | ||
[[File:Snapshot_principle.jpg|700px]] | [[File:Snapshot_principle.jpg|700px]] | ||
Pic 1, principle | Pic 1, principle to make snapshot for an application | ||
As the picture shows, generally the application need to ensure disk | As the picture shows, generally the application need to ensure disk data is consistent at up level, and then | ||
make a clone/mirror of the disk data at that time. So the disk job doesn't have to be done by qemu, qemu can | |||
just ensure data's consistence and let other completed the job remained. | |||
Often snapshots are used frequently to make data recoverable at some time point, for example, a management | |||
program may want following for each VM, which enables data restore for multiple time point, while keeps | |||
the space used little and VM online with good performance all the time. To make things clear, in this text, | |||
I'll call a program want to form following as "incremental backup application". | |||
[[File:Vmbackup_Common_goal.jpg|700px]] | [[File:Vmbackup_Common_goal.jpg|700px]] | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Note the key requirements of it: delta data and base are separated, vmstate data are standalone, and a hidden | |||
one:VM need good performance. | |||
= User Cases = | = User Cases = | ||
As show above, how deep it can recover to, resulting a choice of whether to save vmstate. Who take the action, resulting a | As show above, how deep it can recover to, resulting a choice of whether to save vmstate. Who take the action, resulting a | ||
choice of whether qemu write/read the snapshot itself. | choice of whether qemu write/read the snapshot itself. How to take the action resulting external/internal cases. There are | ||
basically three choices of them, as following: | |||
[[File:function_blocks.jpg|700px]] | [[File:function_blocks.jpg|700px]] | ||
pic3, co-operation relationship in the big picture | pic3, co-operation relationship in the big picture | ||
Typical cases: | Typical cases: | ||
take LVM2 as an example as third party tool, vmstate save are optional, following are the typical cases: | take LVM2 as an example as third party tool, vmstate save are optional, following are the typical cases: | ||
Common Disadvantages now: vmstate size is not predictable in lively saving. | |||
--Type one, qemu manage snapshot: | |||
----Common advantages: less dependence, qemu manages all, workable on most systems. | |||
----Common disadvantages: lower level component have no chance to take the job. | |||
* Case 1: external image snapshot data + external vmstate data | * Case 1: external image snapshot data + external vmstate data | ||
This is what qemu 1.3 support. | This is what qemu 1.3 support. | ||
Step: | Step: | ||
1 save vmstate to external place. | 1 lively save vmstate to external place. | ||
2 blkdev-snapshot-sync each block device. | 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. | ||
3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. | |||
4 blkdev-snapshot-sync each block device, get readonly image. | |||
5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. | |||
6 restore guest FS by GA. | |||
7 Copy out readonly image. | |||
8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. | |||
9 merge the image files. | |||
Advantages: | |||
Directly we have readonly standalone base / delta image files, "incremental backup application" can directly copy | |||
out them to form a chain. | |||
Disadvantages: | |||
External chain are slower in deleting(merging), reading that internal snapshot. | |||
* Case 2: internal image snapshot data + | * Case 2: internal image snapshot data + internal vmstate data | ||
This is what qemu 1.3 supported, but not lively. | |||
Step: | Step: | ||
1 save vmstate to | 1 lively save vmstate to internal qcow2 file. | ||
2 | 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. | ||
3 | 3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. | ||
4 | 4 blkdev-snapshot-internal-sync each block device. | ||
5 resume. | 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. | ||
6 restore guest FS by GA. | |||
7 export base/delta internal data by an qemu API. | |||
8 export vmstate internal data by an qemu API. | |||
9 delete the internal snapshot. | |||
Advantages: | |||
Better performance for running VM and deleting is faster, than external case. | |||
Disadvantages: | |||
The data are not separated, a tool is needed to export them, which seems not available | |||
in qemu now. | |||
* Case 3: internal image | * Case 3: internal image snapshot data + external vmstate data | ||
Step: | Step: | ||
1 save vmstate to external | 1 lively save vmstate to external qcow2 file. | ||
2 | 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. | ||
3 | 3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. | ||
4 | 4 blkdev-snapshot-internal-sync each block device. | ||
5 resume. | 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. | ||
6 restore guest FS by GA. | |||
7 export base/delta internal data by an qemu API. | |||
8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. | |||
9 delete the internal snapshot. | |||
Advantages: | |||
Same with case 2, except vmstate is already stand alone. | |||
Disadvantages: | |||
Same with case 2, May have not paired vmstate with block snapshots, but not a problem if | |||
management stack handle it. | |||
Small summary: | |||
Case 3 seems the best, for it have best performance, and qemu need to provide | |||
a way to transform internal snapshot and external snapshot each other, that is something | |||
like: qemu_export_internal_delta(int *id, char *buf). But I haven't confirm if it is possible | |||
to export base data lively in theory of qcow2. If not we may need to combine external/internal | |||
steps to form a incremental back up chain with better performance. | |||
* Case 4: | --Type two, qemu do not manage snapshot: | ||
* Case 4: block I/O drain + external vmstate data | |||
Step: | Step: | ||
1 save vmstate to | 1 lively save vmstate to external place. | ||
2 | 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. | ||
3 block I/O drain and then pause VM or queue I/O. | |||
4 3rd part components create snapshot. | |||
5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. | |||
6 restore guest FS by GA. | |||
7 3rd part component to get delta/base data. | |||
8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. | |||
9 3rd part component to merge its snapshot. | |||
Advantages: | |||
Faster, backing chain and block bitmap management can be offloaded from qemu to lower component, this also gives a | |||
chance to let lower software/hardware accelerate it. | |||
Disadvantages: | |||
Need extra components. | |||
As a summary: | As a summary: | ||
For qemu managing snapshot type, recommend case 1 for 1st generation of incremental backup, implement case 3 to | |||
get better performance. | |||
For qemu not managing snapshot type, implement the missing part and let the dedicated software/hardware do it. | |||
It is also possible to define some interface(snapshot ioctl call for a host block devie) and let 3rd part implement it, | |||
as an alternative method. | |||
= API design = | = API design = |
Latest revision as of 09:21, 25 January 2013
VM Snapshot enhancement
This feature will enhance VM snapshot functionality, to make it possible lively taking internal/external snapshots, and make it works better with underlining components such as LVM to take snapshot by them instead of qemu. Qemu then will have a completed picture about snapshot methods:
--qemu manage snapshots:
|----internal case
|----external case
--qemu do not manage snapshots:
|----block drain case
- Name: Wenchao Xia
- Email: xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaxia347os@163.com
General Summary
This feature would provide APIs that can do:
- 1 block device live snapshot as internal/external data or drain I/O to cooperate with external components, export sync API for all type.
- 2 vmstate live save as internal/external data, export async API for external data, with fixed size.
- 3 combination of above, and make screendump at the correct time.
Subtask Details
TBD.
General Goal
First consider what is needed to take snapshot for an common application, or qemu:
Pic 1, principle to make snapshot for an application
As the picture shows, generally the application need to ensure disk data is consistent at up level, and then
make a clone/mirror of the disk data at that time. So the disk job doesn't have to be done by qemu, qemu can
just ensure data's consistence and let other completed the job remained.
Often snapshots are used frequently to make data recoverable at some time point, for example, a management
program may want following for each VM, which enables data restore for multiple time point, while keeps
the space used little and VM online with good performance all the time. To make things clear, in this text,
I'll call a program want to form following as "incremental backup application".
Pic 2, general goal on backup server
Note the key requirements of it: delta data and base are separated, vmstate data are standalone, and a hidden
one:VM need good performance.
User Cases
As show above, how deep it can recover to, resulting a choice of whether to save vmstate. Who take the action, resulting a choice of whether qemu write/read the snapshot itself. How to take the action resulting external/internal cases. There are basically three choices of them, as following:
pic3, co-operation relationship in the big picture
Typical cases:
take LVM2 as an example as third party tool, vmstate save are optional, following are the typical cases:
Common Disadvantages now: vmstate size is not predictable in lively saving.
--Type one, qemu manage snapshot:
Common advantages: less dependence, qemu manages all, workable on most systems.
Common disadvantages: lower level component have no chance to take the job.
- Case 1: external image snapshot data + external vmstate data
This is what qemu 1.3 support. Step:
1 lively save vmstate to external place. 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. 3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. 4 blkdev-snapshot-sync each block device, get readonly image. 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. 6 restore guest FS by GA. 7 Copy out readonly image. 8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. 9 merge the image files.
Advantages:
Directly we have readonly standalone base / delta image files, "incremental backup application" can directly copy out them to form a chain.
Disadvantages:
External chain are slower in deleting(merging), reading that internal snapshot.
- Case 2: internal image snapshot data + internal vmstate data
This is what qemu 1.3 supported, but not lively. Step:
1 lively save vmstate to internal qcow2 file. 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. 3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. 4 blkdev-snapshot-internal-sync each block device. 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. 6 restore guest FS by GA. 7 export base/delta internal data by an qemu API. 8 export vmstate internal data by an qemu API. 9 delete the internal snapshot.
Advantages:
Better performance for running VM and deleting is faster, than external case.
Disadvantages:
The data are not separated, a tool is needed to export them, which seems not available in qemu now.
- Case 3: internal image snapshot data + external vmstate data
Step:
1 lively save vmstate to external qcow2 file. 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. 3 freeze qemu block I/O by pause VM or queue I/O. 4 blkdev-snapshot-internal-sync each block device. 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. 6 restore guest FS by GA. 7 export base/delta internal data by an qemu API. 8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. 9 delete the internal snapshot.
Advantages:
Same with case 2, except vmstate is already stand alone.
Disadvantages:
Same with case 2, May have not paired vmstate with block snapshots, but not a problem if management stack handle it.
Small summary:
Case 3 seems the best, for it have best performance, and qemu need to provide
a way to transform internal snapshot and external snapshot each other, that is something
like: qemu_export_internal_delta(int *id, char *buf). But I haven't confirm if it is possible
to export base data lively in theory of qcow2. If not we may need to combine external/internal
steps to form a incremental back up chain with better performance.
--Type two, qemu do not manage snapshot:
- Case 4: block I/O drain + external vmstate data
Step:
1 lively save vmstate to external place. 2 at 95%, freeze guest FS by GA. 3 block I/O drain and then pause VM or queue I/O. 4 3rd part components create snapshot. 5 restore qemu block I/O by resume VM or flush queued I/O. 6 restore guest FS by GA. 7 3rd part component to get delta/base data. 8 Copy out vmstate file, if vmstate need to be stored in another place. 9 3rd part component to merge its snapshot.
Advantages:
Faster, backing chain and block bitmap management can be offloaded from qemu to lower component, this also gives a chance to let lower software/hardware accelerate it.
Disadvantages:
Need extra components.
As a summary:
For qemu managing snapshot type, recommend case 1 for 1st generation of incremental backup, implement case 3 to
get better performance.
For qemu not managing snapshot type, implement the missing part and let the dedicated software/hardware do it.
It is also possible to define some interface(snapshot ioctl call for a host block devie) and let 3rd part implement it,
as an alternative method.
API design
TBD.
Progress
TBD.