Features/SnapshottingImprovements: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
Adjust the '''savevm''', '''loadvm''' and '''info snapshots''' commands to facilitate the transtion to QMP. | |||
This page is being maintained by the GSoC student Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho as part the [[Google_Summer_of_Code_2010/QMP|QMP project]]. All feedback is appreciated. | |||
== Issues == | == Issues == | ||
{| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
! Index | |||
! Problem | ! Problem | ||
! Difficulty | ! Difficulty | ||
Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
! Status | ! Status | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1 | |||
| [[#Snapshot existence is not verified before bdrv_snapshot_goto() | Snapshot existence is not verified before bdrv_snapshot_goto()]] | |||
| Easy | |||
| | |||
* Improve the resilience of the load_vmstate() function, doing further and better ordered tests. | |||
| | |||
* Patch applied to the block branch: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/kevin.git/commit/d98644fe6fc05ce75c203c761920a6948b0ad853 | |||
|- | |||
| 2 | |||
| [[#Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots | Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots]] | | [[#Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots | Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots]] | ||
| Easy | | Easy | ||
| | | | ||
* Consolidate the snapshot information to show only snapshots fully available | * Consolidate the snapshot information to show only snapshots fully available | ||
* Do not display block device information anymore | * Do not display any block device information anymore | ||
| rowspan=3 | | |||
* Patch v2: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-08/msg00346.html | |||
|- | |||
| 3 | |||
| [[#Do not allow empty names |Do not allow empty names]] | |||
| Easy | |||
| | | | ||
* If the user does not specify a name, we must create a name from a template, using a timestamp like: '''vm-20100801121212'''. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 4 | |||
| [[#Snapshot overwriting|Snapshot overwriting]] | | [[#Snapshot overwriting|Snapshot overwriting]] | ||
| Easy | | Easy | ||
Line 23: | Line 43: | ||
* Don't save the snapshot if the name given by the user already exists. | * Don't save the snapshot if the name given by the user already exists. | ||
* If the user really wants to overwrite it, add a '''-f''' parameter to '''savevm'''. | * If the user really wants to overwrite it, add a '''-f''' parameter to '''savevm'''. | ||
* | * In case of overwriting, do not reuse the ID, just the name. | ||
| | |- | ||
| 5 | |||
| [[#snapshot ID collision|snapshot ID collision]] | |||
| Easy | |||
| | |||
* Use an stronger ID numbering system instead of simple sequential decimal numbers | |||
* Take the ID generation out of the block drivers | |||
* UUID seams a good mechanism, needs to depend on libuuid-dev | |||
| Patch v1: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-08/msg00204.html | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 6 | |||
| [[#ID and TAG confusion|ID and TAG confusion]] | | [[#ID and TAG confusion|ID and TAG confusion]] | ||
| Medium | | Medium | ||
| | | | ||
* When specifying an snapshot to be loaded or saved, only use names/tags. | * When specifying an snapshot to be loaded or saved, only use names/tags. | ||
* | * Have separate commands to load by ID and name, or add parameters to explicitly distinguish one from another in '''loadvm'''. | ||
* | * Do not support '''savevm <ID>''' anymore. We are trying not to expose ID information to the user. | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 7 | |||
| [[#inheritance|inheritance]] | | [[#inheritance|inheritance]] | ||
| Hard | | Hard | ||
Line 50: | Line 71: | ||
* When loading and saving snapshots, verify if extra_data_size > 0 and feed the information info QEMUSnapshotInfo.parent_id_str | * When loading and saving snapshots, verify if extra_data_size > 0 and feed the information info QEMUSnapshotInfo.parent_id_str | ||
* libvirt wants this feature | * libvirt wants this feature | ||
* Update the '''info snapshots''' output to show the | * Update the '''info snapshots''' output to hide ID and PARENT_ID information | ||
| | * Add another command to show full details of snapshots | ||
* The ID information must not be exposed to the user, unless when using '''qemu-img''' to inspect a disk image. | |||
| Patch v1: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-08/msg00204.html | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Snapshot existence is not verified before bdrv_snapshot_goto() == | |||
This patch improves the resilience of the load_vmstate() function, doing | |||
further and better ordered tests. | |||
In load_vmstate(), if there is any error on bdrv_snapshot_goto(), except if the | |||
error is on VM state device, load_vmstate() will return zero and the VM will be | |||
started with major corruption chances. | |||
== Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots == | == Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots == | ||
Line 93: | Line 124: | ||
3 1.5M 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 | 3 1.5M 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 | ||
4 1.5M 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763 | 4 1.5M 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763 | ||
== Do not allow empty names == | |||
When running: | |||
(qemu) savevm | |||
The snapshot is saved without a name and can only be loaded using the generated ID. The idea is to not have IDs exposed, so every snapshot must have a name. | |||
== Snapshot overwriting == | == Snapshot overwriting == | ||
Is this the expected behavior? Don't think so. | |||
=== By id === | === By id === | ||
Line 119: | Line 153: | ||
1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:31 00:00:03.696 | 1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:31 00:00:03.696 | ||
2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:53 00:00:25.918 <-- 17:08:53 | 2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:53 00:00:25.918 <-- 17:08:53 | ||
=== By tag === | === By tag === | ||
Line 142: | Line 173: | ||
Ideas for improvements: | Ideas for improvements: | ||
* Do not allow the user to overwrite an snapshot, even if saving with the same name (will have different IDs anyway) | * Do not allow the user to overwrite an snapshot, even if saving with the same name (will have different IDs anyway) | ||
== snapshot ID collision == | |||
qemu-img create -f qcow2 diskA.qcow2 10G | |||
qemu-img create -f qcow2 diskB.qcow2 10G | |||
qemu -hda diskA.qcow2 | |||
(qemu) savevm a | |||
(qemu) savevm b | |||
(qemu) savevm c | |||
qemu -hda diskB.qcow2 | |||
(qemu) savevm a | |||
(qemu) savevm b | |||
qemu -hda diskB.qcow2 -hdb diskA.qcow2 | |||
(qemu) loadvm b | |||
diskA.qcow2 and diskB.qcow2 have both the same snapshot identification '''b''' and '''2''', but they were taken at different moments and must not be loaded. We need an stronger ID mechanism to identify snapshots among different disks. It is not a common case, but we reduce the chance of anyone having trouble. | |||
== ID and TAG confusion == | == ID and TAG confusion == | ||
What other projects do? | |||
* VirtualBox does not allow specifying an ID, just a name and description of an snapshot. http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#snapshots | |||
* VMware does not allow specifying an ID, just a name and description. http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1015180 | |||
* XenServer does not allow specifying an ID, just a name. http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/23735-102-646135/Administrators_Guide.pdf - page 127 | |||
Starting a VM with no previous snapshot on the disks. | Starting a VM with no previous snapshot on the disks. | ||
Line 171: | Line 226: | ||
(qemu) loadvm_byid 3 | (qemu) loadvm_byid 3 | ||
(qemu) loadvm_bytag xxx | (qemu) loadvm_bytag xxx | ||
== inheritance == | == inheritance == | ||
Line 228: | Line 245: | ||
5 e 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:28 00:00:15.548 | 5 e 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:28 00:00:15.548 | ||
Snapshot '''e''' is newer than '''d''', but it is an state saved right after '''b''', and not '''d''' as implied by the ids and dates. | Snapshot '''e''' is newer than '''d''', but it is an state saved right after '''b''', and not '''d''' as implied by the ids and dates. libvirt wants this. | ||
== QMP == | == QMP == | ||
Here is a list of suggested commands to manipulate snapshots information on a QEMU VM. | Here is a list of suggested commands to manipulate snapshots information on a QEMU VM. | ||
== query-snapshot-status == | === query-snapshot-status === | ||
Returns '''true''' when the VM can be snapshotted, '''false''' otherwise. | Returns '''true''' when the VM can be snapshotted, '''false''' otherwise. | ||
Line 317: | Line 330: | ||
} | } | ||
] | ] | ||
[[Category:Obsolete feature pages]] |
Latest revision as of 15:26, 11 October 2016
Summary
Adjust the savevm, loadvm and info snapshots commands to facilitate the transtion to QMP.
This page is being maintained by the GSoC student Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho as part the QMP project. All feedback is appreciated.
Issues
Index | Problem | Difficulty | Proposed solution | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Snapshot existence is not verified before bdrv_snapshot_goto() | Easy |
|
|
2 | Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots | Easy |
|
|
3 | Do not allow empty names | Easy |
| |
4 | Snapshot overwriting | Easy |
| |
5 | snapshot ID collision | Easy |
|
Patch v1: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-08/msg00204.html |
6 | ID and TAG confusion | Medium |
|
|
7 | inheritance | Hard |
|
Patch v1: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-08/msg00204.html |
Snapshot existence is not verified before bdrv_snapshot_goto()
This patch improves the resilience of the load_vmstate() function, doing further and better ordered tests.
In load_vmstate(), if there is any error on bdrv_snapshot_goto(), except if the error is on VM state device, load_vmstate() will return zero and the VM will be started with major corruption chances.
Monitor shows wrong information about snapshots
The output generated by 'info snapshots' shows only snapshots that exist on the block device that saves the VM state. This output can cause an user to erroneously try to load an snapshot that is not available on all block devices.
$ qemu-img snapshot -l xxtest.qcow2 Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 1.5M 2010-07-26 16:51:52 00:00:08.599 2 1.5M 2010-07-26 16:51:53 00:00:09.719 3 1.5M 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 4 1.5M 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763
$ qemu-img snapshot -l xxtest2.qcow2 Snapshot list: ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 3 0 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 4 0 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763
Current output:
$ qemu -hda xxtest.qcow2 -hdb xxtest2.qcow2 -monitor stdio -vnc :0 QEMU 0.12.4 monitor - type 'help' for more information (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 1.5M 2010-07-26 16:51:52 00:00:08.599 2 1.5M 2010-07-26 16:51:53 00:00:09.719 3 1.5M 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 4 1.5M 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763
Snapshots 1 and 2 do not exist on xxtest2.qcow, but they are displayed anyway.
New output:
(qemu) info snapshots ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 3 1.5M 2010-07-26 17:26:49 00:00:13.245 4 1.5M 2010-07-26 19:01:00 00:00:46.763
Do not allow empty names
When running:
(qemu) savevm
The snapshot is saved without a name and can only be loaded using the generated ID. The idea is to not have IDs exposed, so every snapshot must have a name.
Snapshot overwriting
Is this the expected behavior? Don't think so.
By id
(qemu) savevm (qemu) savevm (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:31 00:00:03.696 2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:33 00:00:05.419 <-- 17:08:33 (qemu) savevm 2 <overwrittes the snapshot with id 2> (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:31 00:00:03.696 2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:08:53 00:00:25.918 <-- 17:08:53
By tag
(qemu) savevm test1 (qemu) savevm test2 (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 test1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:12:11 00:00:08.126 <-- 17:12:11 2 test2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:12:19 00:00:16.053 (qemu) savevm test1 (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 2 test2 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:12:19 00:00:16.053 1 test1 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:12:33 00:00:29.221 <-- 17:12:33
Ideas for improvements:
- Do not allow the user to overwrite an snapshot, even if saving with the same name (will have different IDs anyway)
snapshot ID collision
qemu-img create -f qcow2 diskA.qcow2 10G qemu-img create -f qcow2 diskB.qcow2 10G
qemu -hda diskA.qcow2 (qemu) savevm a (qemu) savevm b (qemu) savevm c
qemu -hda diskB.qcow2 (qemu) savevm a (qemu) savevm b
qemu -hda diskB.qcow2 -hdb diskA.qcow2 (qemu) loadvm b
diskA.qcow2 and diskB.qcow2 have both the same snapshot identification b and 2, but they were taken at different moments and must not be loaded. We need an stronger ID mechanism to identify snapshots among different disks. It is not a common case, but we reduce the chance of anyone having trouble.
ID and TAG confusion
What other projects do?
- VirtualBox does not allow specifying an ID, just a name and description of an snapshot. http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#snapshots
- VMware does not allow specifying an ID, just a name and description. http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1015180
- XenServer does not allow specifying an ID, just a name. http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/23735-102-646135/Administrators_Guide.pdf - page 127
Starting a VM with no previous snapshot on the disks.
(qemu) savevm 2 (qemu) savevm (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 2 1.5M 2010-07-21 16:55:48 00:00:15.581 2 1.5M 2010-07-21 16:55:55 00:00:21.501 (qemu) loadvm 2 <loads the VM with the id 2>
It is not clear witch snapshot is going to be loaded.
Ideas for improvements:
- savevm tests the argument to check if it is an ID or a TAG. Make it accept only a TAG and do not allow the user to specify and ID.
- loadvm does the same thing. The user must specify if an ID or TAG is wanted. Suggestions:
(qemu) loadvm id=3 (qemu) loadvm tag=xxx (qemu) loadvm xxx <error> (qemu) loadvm 3 <error>
In case loadvm cannot be changed due to retro-compatibility, introduce a new command. Suggestions:
(qemu) load_vm id=3 (qemu) load_vm tag=xxx (qemu) loadvm_byid 3 (qemu) loadvm_bytag xxx
inheritance
The only way to know witch snapshot came before of after another is to look at the date, but it is not possible to fully deduct the relationship. e.g.:
(qemu) savevm a (qemu) savevm b (qemu) savevm c (qemu) savevm d (qemu) loadvm b (qemu) savevm e (qemu) info snapshots Snapshot devices: ide0-hd0 Snapshot list (from ide0-hd0): ID TAG VM SIZE DATE VM CLOCK 1 a 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:32:55 00:00:06.144 2 b 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:00 00:00:11.103 3 c 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:13 00:00:22.953 4 d 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:16 00:00:26.289 5 e 3.9M 2010-07-21 17:33:28 00:00:15.548
Snapshot e is newer than d, but it is an state saved right after b, and not d as implied by the ids and dates. libvirt wants this.
QMP
Here is a list of suggested commands to manipulate snapshots information on a QEMU VM.
query-snapshot-status
Returns true when the VM can be snapshotted, false otherwise.
-> {"execute": "query-snapshot-status"} <- {"return": true }
- Not sure if QMP allow returning just a boolean.
snapshot-create
Runs savevm.
-> {"execute": "snapshot-create", "arguments": {"name": "vm_before_upgrade"} } <- { "return": {} }
- "name" is mandatory and must be unique.
- Needs to return any errors.
snapshot-delete
Runs delvm.
-> {"execute": "snapshot-delete", "arguments": {"name": "vm_before_upgrade"} } <- { "return": {} }
- "name" is mandatory and must be unique.
- Needs to return any errors.
snapshot-load
Runs loadvm.
-> {"execute": "snapshot-load", "arguments": {"name": "vm_before_upgrade"} } <- { "return": {} }
- "name" is mandatory and must be unique.
- Needs to return any errors.
query-snapshots
-> {"execute": "query-snapshots"} <- { "return": [ { "name": "vm_before_upgrade", "parent_name": "", "id": "3fab28c9-a6bd-4659-b9bc-683780d8a2d5", "parent_id": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "date": 20100415164856 }, { "name": "vm_before_upgrade-2", "parent_name": "vm_before_upgrade", "id": "e693dce2-6e12-4474-9bbf-2b3f97323423", "parent_id": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "date": 20100415100000 } ] }
- Do we really need to expose IDs or names should be enough?
- Does JSON has a date type of just using a integer like YYYYMMDDHHMMSS would be better?
Instead of a list, how about this:
-> {"execute": "query-snapshots"} <- { "return": [ { "vm_before_upgrade": { "id": "3fab28c9-a6bd-4659-b9bc-683780d8a2d5", "date": 20100415164856, "child": { "vm_before_upgrade-2": "id": "e693dce2-6e12-4474-9bbf-2b3f97323423", "date": 20100415100000 } } "random-backup": { "id": "abcdefcc-a6bd-4659-b9bc-683780d8a2d5", "date": 20111111111111 } } ]