Features/Migration-Multiple-fds: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→owner) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* '''Name:''' [[User:Quintela|Juan Quintela]] | * '''Name:''' [[User:Quintela|Juan Quintela]] | ||
* ''' Email:''' quintela@redhat.com | * ''' Email:''' quintela@redhat.com | ||
* ''' IRC: ''' quintela (oftc | * ''' IRC: ''' quintela (oftc) | ||
== Current Status == | == Current Status == | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
== Design == | == Design == | ||
Current migration code uses a single migration stream, so for memory pages, we are writting things like: | |||
[page header 1][4k page 1][page header 2][4k page 2] | |||
Idea is to change this to two streams: | |||
* migration stream | |||
[page header 1][page header 2] | |||
* additional fd | |||
[4k page 1][4 page 2] | |||
This allows us: | |||
* not use a single copy in either sending or receive. We just send the page directly and receive it in place | |||
* We don't modify the migration stream. The only difference is that pages payload gets received on a side channel | |||
* We can do like send/receive HUGE pages in one go, making life for Transparent Huge pages easier | |||
We could also adapt this code for RDMA. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 6 February 2023
Feature Name
Use multiple FD's for migration
owner
- Name: Juan Quintela
- Email: quintela@redhat.com
- IRC: quintela (oftc)
Current Status
WIP
Summary
Currently there is a single stream for migration, this causes several problems:
- CPU that does the reception is a bottleneck on 10Gigabit and faster
- We copy all the pages for migration, even when we can send directly
- We make Transparent HugePages more difficult to use
So, the idea here is to split the migration stream in two, one for the current code, and the other for the content of the RAM pages. This avoids the copies altogether.
Scope
Only needs changes in QEMU. It can be configured if used or not for the cases where the destination don't know about it.
How to use
To enable the feature:
migrate_set_capability x-multiple-fds on
And it would be use from there. Notice that it needs to be enabled in both sides.
Added commands / state
- Migration capability: x-multiple-fds
Design
Current migration code uses a single migration stream, so for memory pages, we are writting things like:
[page header 1][4k page 1][page header 2][4k page 2]
Idea is to change this to two streams:
- migration stream
[page header 1][page header 2]
- additional fd
[4k page 1][4 page 2]
This allows us:
- not use a single copy in either sending or receive. We just send the page directly and receive it in place
- We don't modify the migration stream. The only difference is that pages payload gets received on a side channel
- We can do like send/receive HUGE pages in one go, making life for Transparent Huge pages easier
We could also adapt this code for RDMA.
Major components
Future Enhancements
- Enable the use of more than one fd
- Use a different fd for postcopy page faults
- Use a different fd for each compression/decompression cpu