Features/SnapshotsMultipleDevices/CommandSetProposals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Two different patch series posted on the mailing list sparked a discussion on block device operations | Two different patch series posted on the mailing list sparked a discussion on block device operations | ||
(snapshotting, enabling mirroring, switching to a different image) that have to be performed atomically. | (snapshotting, enabling mirroring, switching to a different image) that have to be performed atomically. | ||
One is Jeff Cody's multiple-device snapshot series, documented [[Features/SnapshotsMultipleDevices|here]]. | |||
The other is Federico Simoncelli's device mirroring series. | |||
This page documents the four approaches that were discussed. | This page documents the four approaches that were discussed. | ||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
== Federico Simoncelli == | == Federico Simoncelli == | ||
Federico's patches are tailored on oVirt's use of live snapshots. oVirt wants to create snapshot files outside QEMU to have control on the paths that are used for backing files. To this end, a drive-reopen command is provided that can be used instead of blockdev-snapshot-sync if the snapshot file is created externally. | |||
A second command, drive-migrate, activates mirroring on a given block device. Because of the same constraint on creating snapshots externally, oVirt in practice a combination of a drive-reopen command + activation of mirroring. And because the two operations have to be done atomically, drive-migrate also needs to specify a new source file. | |||
{ 'drive-reopen', | { 'drive-reopen', | ||
Line 30: | Line 38: | ||
:Patches on the mailing list. | :Patches on the mailing list. | ||
;Disavantages: | ;Disavantages: | ||
:Complicated interface tailored only on the oVirt usecase (Paolo tried to shoehorn | :Complicated interface tailored only on the oVirt usecase (Paolo tried to shoehorn more general-purpose cases in the same drive-migrate command, but with little success). Doesn't extend to mirroring multiple devices. | ||
== Paolo Bonzini == | == Paolo Bonzini == | ||
Adding transactions lets oVirt express its desired combination of drive-reopen + drive-mirror as two commands wrapped in a transaction. | |||
The existing blockdev-snapshot-sync command would need changes to support invocations in a transaction, based on Jeff's code. | |||
{ 'command' : 'blockdev-start-transaction' } | { 'command' : 'blockdev-start-transaction' } | ||
Line 47: | Line 59: | ||
:Requires changes to Jeff's patches. Core infrastructure changes needed for transactions (though most of the algorithms are already found in Jeff's patches). | :Requires changes to Jeff's patches. Core infrastructure changes needed for transactions (though most of the algorithms are already found in Jeff's patches). | ||
== Anthony Liguori == | |||
Anthony proposed a pair of commands to freeze/unfreeze a block device. This can also provide atomicity. | |||
{ 'command' : 'blockdev-freeze', | { 'command' : 'blockdev-freeze', |
Revision as of 21:32, 27 February 2012
Two different patch series posted on the mailing list sparked a discussion on block device operations (snapshotting, enabling mirroring, switching to a different image) that have to be performed atomically.
One is Jeff Cody's multiple-device snapshot series, documented here.
The other is Federico Simoncelli's device mirroring series.
This page documents the four approaches that were discussed.
Jeff Cody
{ 'type': 'SnapshotDev', 'data': {'device': 'str', 'snapshot-file': 'str', '*format': 'str' } } { 'command': 'blkdev-group-snapshot-sync', 'data': { 'devlist': [ 'SnapshotDev' ] } }
A single command prepares snapshots for many devices and commits the transaction if all snapshots are successfully prepared.
- Advantages
- Patches are almost ready for inclusion. Simple interface with only one command.
- Disadvantages
- No support for reopening and mirroring. Introducing them later is possible, but needs to be done before 1.1 in case API changes are needed.
- Improved error handling does not extend to the existing blockdev-snapshot-sync command.
Federico Simoncelli
Federico's patches are tailored on oVirt's use of live snapshots. oVirt wants to create snapshot files outside QEMU to have control on the paths that are used for backing files. To this end, a drive-reopen command is provided that can be used instead of blockdev-snapshot-sync if the snapshot file is created externally.
A second command, drive-migrate, activates mirroring on a given block device. Because of the same constraint on creating snapshots externally, oVirt in practice a combination of a drive-reopen command + activation of mirroring. And because the two operations have to be done atomically, drive-migrate also needs to specify a new source file.
{ 'drive-reopen', 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'source': 'str', '*format': 'str' } } { 'drive-migrate', 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'dest': 'str', '*dest-format': 'str', 'new-source': 'str', '*source-format': 'str' } }
- Advantages
- Patches on the mailing list.
- Disavantages
- Complicated interface tailored only on the oVirt usecase (Paolo tried to shoehorn more general-purpose cases in the same drive-migrate command, but with little success). Doesn't extend to mirroring multiple devices.
Paolo Bonzini
Adding transactions lets oVirt express its desired combination of drive-reopen + drive-mirror as two commands wrapped in a transaction.
The existing blockdev-snapshot-sync command would need changes to support invocations in a transaction, based on Jeff's code.
{ 'command' : 'blockdev-start-transaction' } { 'command' : 'blockdev-commit-transaction' } { 'command' : 'blockdev-abort-transaction' } { 'command' : 'drive-reopen', 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'source': 'str', '*format': 'str' } } { 'command' : drive-mirror, 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'dest': 'str', '*format': 'str' } }
- Advantages
- Uniform handling of all cases. oVirt usecase falls out nicely. Improved error handling extends to the existing blockdev-snapshot-sync command.
- Disadvantages
- Requires changes to Jeff's patches. Core infrastructure changes needed for transactions (though most of the algorithms are already found in Jeff's patches).
Anthony Liguori
Anthony proposed a pair of commands to freeze/unfreeze a block device. This can also provide atomicity.
{ 'command' : 'blockdev-freeze', 'data': { 'device': 'str' } } { 'command' : 'blockdev-unfreeze', 'data': { 'device': 'str' } } { 'command' : 'drive-reopen', 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'source': 'str', '*format': 'str' } } { 'command' : drive-mirror, 'data': { 'device': 'str', 'dest': 'str', '*format': 'str' } }
- Advantages
- Poses fewest problems in adding new kinds of operations. oVirt usecase falls out nicely. Subsumes group snapshots too, but management would have to provide its own error handling.
- Disadvantages
- Requires changes to Jeff's patches. Management probably cannot provide the improvements in error handling provided by Jeff's patches. Core infrastructure changes needed for freeze/unfreeze.