Features/CPUModels

Summary

This page was about the feature of "externally-configurable" CPU models, but its scope was gradually changed to discussion about the design of the CPU code, the CPU model system. The old "cpudef" config section was deprecated, so the original description doesn't apply anymore.

Owner

• Name: Eduardo Habkost
• Email: ehabkost@redhat.com

Detailed Summary

The old "cpudef" config section was deprecated because there are expectations that QEMU is going to provide the CPU model list, and will keep migration compatibility using machine-types, and keeping machine-type compatibility (something that is inside the QEMU C code) while keeping the CPU model definitions external would be a dependency/layering violation. Now both CPU model definitions and per-machine-type CPU-model compatibility code are inside the QEMU C code.

The pseudo CPUID flag 'check' when appearing in the command line feature flag list will warn when feature flags (either implicit in a cpu model or explicit on the command line) would have otherwise been quietly unavailable to a guest:

   # qemu-system-x86_64 ... -cpu Nehalem,check
   warning: host cpuid 0000_0001 lacks requested flag 'sse4.2|sse4_2' [0x00100000]
   warning: host cpuid 0000_0001 lacks requested flag 'popcnt' [0x00800000]

A similar 'enforce' pseudo flag exists which in addition to the above causes qemu to error exit if requested flags are unavailable.

Roadmap

After QEMU 1.4

• CPU feature words refactor
• x86 CPU properties (Igor Mammedov)
  • Being redone to use static properties
• machine-friendly error reporting of -cpu enforce/check
• x86 CPU model subclasses
• Allow changing of Hypervisor CPUIDs (Don Slutz)
• Probing for CPU features supported by the host and can be enabled
• Probing for the features that are actually enabled on each CPU model

Already done

QEMU 1.4

• Make CPU a subclass of DeviceState (included)
• APIC-ID-related topology fixes (ehabkost) (RFC submitted)
• Fixes for -cpu enforce flag

Before QEMU 1.4

• Drop "-cpu ?dump" (Peter Maydell)
• Move CPU models to C code (ehabkost)
• Eliminate cpudef config section support (ehabkost)
• "unduplicate feature names" series (ehabkost)
• -cpu host use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID (ehabkost)
• add feature flag name list for CPUID 7

Current Issues and proposed changes

Interfaces/requirements from libvirt

Ensuring predictable set of guest features

Requirement: libvirt needs to ensure all features required on the command-line are present and exposed to the guest.

Solution: use the "enforce" flag on the "-cpu" option.

Limitation: no proper machine-friendly interface to report which features are missing.

Workaround: See "querying for host capabilities" below.

Future plans

Machine-friendly reporting of missing host features/capabilities.

Listing CPU models

Requirement: libvirt needs to know which CPU models are available to be used with the "-cpu" option.

Solution: use QMP qom-list-types command.

Dependency: X86CPU subclasses.

Limitation: needs a live QEMU process for the query.

Solution: use QMP query-cpu-definitions command.

Limitation: needs a live QEMU process for the query.

Future plans

It would be interesting to get rid of the requirement for a live QEMU process (with a complete machine being created) to be already running.

Getting information about CPU models

Requirement: libvirt uses the predefined CPU models from QEMU, but it needs to be able to query for CPU model details, to find out how it can create a VM that matches what was requested by the user.

Challenge: the resulting CPU features depend on lots of factors, including the machine-type.

Workaround: start a paused VM and query for the CPU device information after the CPU was created.

Solution: start a paused VM with no devices, but with the right machine-type and right CPU model. Use QMP QOM commands to query for CPU flags (especially the properties starting with the "f-" prefix).

Dependency: X86CPU feature properties ("f-*" properties).

Limitation: requires a live QEMU process with the right machine-type/CPU-model to be started, to make the query.

Requirement: libvirt needs to know if a specific CPU model can be used in the current host.

See "Ensuring predictable set of guest features" above

See "Querying host capabilities" below

Querying host capabilities

Requirement: libvirt needs to know which feature can really be enabled, before it tries to start a VM, and before it tries to start a live-migration process.

The set of available capabilities depend on:

• Host CPU (hardware) capabilities
• Kernel capabilities
• QEMU capabilities

Challenge: QEMU doesn't have a generic capability-querying interface, and host capability querying depends on KVM to be initialized.

Workaround: start a paused VM using the "host" CPU model, that has every single CPU feature supported by the host enabled by default, and query for the information about the CPU though QMP, using the QOM commands.

Current solution: start a paused VM with no devices but with "host" CPU model and use QMP QOM commands to query for the enabled CPU features.

Dependency: X86CPU feature properties

Future plans

It would be interesting to have a more generic capability-querying interface that doesn't require starting a whole machine with a live QEMU process.

See also: -query-capabilities RFC series from Anthony

Message-Id: <1332169763-30665-9-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Solved challenges

Allowing CPU models to be updated

We need a mechanism to allow the existing CPU models on Qemu to be updated, without making guest-visible changes for existing Virtual Machines, when migrating to a new version.

Examples

Examples where CPU model updates are necessary and have to be deployed to users:

• The Nehalem CPU model currently has the wrong "level" value, making CPU topology information unavailable.
• The CPUID PMU leaf was added on Qemu 1.1, but it is not supposed to be visible to guests running using -M pc-1.0
• New features are implemented by KVM and we may want to add them to existing models (e.g. SandyBridge may need to have tsc-deadline added)

Requirements

• A different CPU will be visible to the guest depending on the machine-type chosen.
  • That means that "-M pc-1.0 -cpu Nehalem" will be different from "-M pc-1.1 -cpu Nehalem"
  • Rationale:
    • The meaning of "-M pc-1.0 -cpu Nehalem" can't be changed or it will change existing guests
    • The meaning of "-M pc-1.1 -cpu Nehalem" needs to be different from the pc-1.0 one, otherwise we would be stuck with a broken "Nehalem" model forever

Status/solution

• CPU model definitions were moved to C code, so we can easily add compatibility code to them if necessary
• CPUs are now DeviceState objects
• CPU models will become separate classes, so per-CPU-model compatibility properties can be used on machine-type definitions

-cpu host and feature probing

See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/90035

-cpu host vs -cpu best

Currently we have -cpu host, but the naming and semantics are unclear.

We have 3 possible modes of "try to get the best CPU model":

1. all-you-can-enable: Enable every single bit that can be enabled, including the ones not present on the host but that can be emulated.
2. match-host-CPU: Enable all bits that are present in the host CPU that can be enabled.
3. best-predefined-model: Use the best CPU model available from the pre-defined CPU model list.

Status

• -cpu host will be the "all-you-can-enable" mode, that will enable every bit from GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID on the VCPU
• We're not going to have a mode for match-host-CPU, probably
• A "best-predefined-model" mode can be implemented by libvirt.